Vatan Gateway vs LiteLLM

If you want to operate the gateway yourself, use LiteLLM.

If you want to operate the gateway yourself, use LiteLLM. It is MIT licensed, air-gappable and carries more models than we do. We are the answer when you want the same governance across models AND tools on one bill and would rather somebody else ran it, including inside your own infrastructure.

Use LiteLLM if

You want the source, the MIT licence, or to operate it with nobody else involved. We do not sell any of those. **We will deploy and run our planes inside your infrastructure for Enterprise**, which covers a residency or egress requirement, but that is us operating it in your account rather than you operating it.

 VatanLiteLLM
LicenceClosed, hostedMIT, open source
You operate it yourselfnoDocker, Kubernetes, Terraform, fully air-gapped
Runs in your infrastructure
Different things. Theirs is self-hosting. Ours is a managed deployment in your account, negotiated per contract and not yet a shipped product.
Enterprise: we deploy and operate it in your infrastructureYes, you run it
Models
Ours arrive through an aggregator rather than integrations we wrote, which the deck says out loud.
399 models, through an aggregator140+ providers, 1,892 models
SCIM provisioningnoEnterprise tier
Audit log of admin actionsnoEnterprise tier
Tool servers, governed
Both reach MCP servers. The difference is who may reach which one and what happens when a tool changes.
Approval, per-person grants, credential custodyMCP supported
A changed tool is heldA tool whose description changes is held until re-approvedno
One key across models and toolsOne key for models and tools, one billSeparate concerns
Billing currencyGBP, with the FX rate stamped on every requestYou run it, you pay providers
Operated for youYes, including inside your own accountYou operate it

Read off https://www.litellm.ai on 28 August 2026. If we have it wrong, tell us and we will fix the page.